Business

EEOC sues East Meadow’s dining room for sexual harassment

The East Meadow canteen was named in a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the United States, claiming that the canteen owners and some employees have sexually harassed and discriminated against female staff.

Known for business filing as Stardust Diner’s LLC, Colony Diner was nominated as a defendant in a proceeding filed in the US District Court for Eastern District in early June. The proceedings occur after an investigation by the workers’ rights agency.

According to the proceedings, following the EEOC’s decision to find a “reasonable reason” to believe that Colony Diner used illegal employment practices, authorities agreed that “informal mediation methods” would be “accepted by the Commission.” Was not brought to the court.

The EEOC claims that the canteen’s owners and operators, cousins ​​George and Thomas Striffus, engaged in “illegal employment practices,” and ownership made women working in the canteen a “sex-based hostile working environment.” He said he was exposed.

Cafeteria lawyer Jamie S. Felsen has denied the claim.

“We are aware of the allegations contained in the proceedings against Colony Diner,” Felsen said in a statement in response to Newsday. “They are just claims that Colony Diner would deny and be vigorously defended in court.”

An “individual suffering” in a proceeding is a woman who has been or has been in the process.

From May 2015 to the present, it has been adopted by diners as a server or hostess.

In a statement released on June 3, following the proceedings, Jeffrey Bernstein, a regional lawyer at EEOC’s New York District Office, said, “Victims of harassment by owners or high-level managers. Can be particularly devastating. “

“Under federal employment discrimination law, the company is almost always responsible if the owner, CEO, or president of the company proves to have created a hostile work environment,” Burstein said. I am.

Actions resulting from George Striffus in the proceedings include allegations of non-consensual physical contact, asking female staff personal questions about sexual life, and “screaming and insulting women on a regular basis.” This includes saying that men are more “trustworthy” as employees than women.

In addition, in the proceedings, both co-owners made essentially derogatory “daily remarks” about the appearance of female employees and “quickly and effectively to prevent the spread of sexual harassment of male employees.” I claim that I couldn’t take any action.

EEOC lawyers said that if many women working in the canteen resigned as a result of a hostile work environment and female employees objected to allegations of harassment, ownership would make the suffering employee more than in the canteen. He said he retaliated by assigning a section that collected a few hints.

Recent proceedings are not the only time we have found a local restaurant soaking in hot water over labor issues.

In 2013, co-owners George and Thomas Strifas responded to a joint investigation involving a law firm in the Nassau County district and the federal and state labor departments for underpayment to 72 workers and falsification of records. I pleaded guilty.

The case was the first joint investigation of its kind under the State Wage Theft Prevention Act, which came into force in April 2011.

Owners pay more than $ 500,000 as part of their accusations, including a minimum wage and back wage to resolve overtime breaches of $ 337,780, employee damages of $ 163,742, and state insurance claims of $ 48,681. I agreed to pay.

EEOC sues East Meadow’s dining room for sexual harassment

Source link EEOC sues East Meadow’s dining room for sexual harassment

Related Articles

Back to top button