According to a new Cornell University study, journalism fact checking is a more effective countermeasure against false information in COVID-19 than the false news tags commonly used on social media.
“more information It may be an antidote to false information. ” Political Scientists Sarah Kreps and Douglas Klinner conclude.
Kreps and Kriner are co-authors of “COVID-I9 Infodemic and the Effectiveness of Interventions Aimed at Reducing False Alarms” published February 16. Quarterly public opinion.. Krebs is Professor John L. Wetheril, Interim Chair of the Government, Director of the Cornell Tech Policy Lab at the University of Arts and Sciences, and Cliner is Professor Clinton Rossiter and Faculty Director of the American Department of Government (A & S). .. At the Institute of Political and Global Affairs; both are faculty members at Cornell Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy.
Researchers say the pandemic has caused a surge in false information that threatens public health by drowning the facts and encouraging individuals to take action that is at best ineffective and, in the worst case, harmful.
Media outlets countered the flow of false claims with two tools.
- Fake tags are labels used by social media companies.They often partially obscure a post by saying it is “False information, Checked by an independent fact checker. The crawler does not have easy access to the details of that check.
- Journalism fact checking flag posts falsely and at the same time provide information that refutes false claims, along with links to additional information.
These fact checks have been commonly used to assess the accuracy of statements made by political candidates. The work by Kreps and Kriner is one of the first to test them in the context of COVID-19.
Kriner and Kreps have created findings based on a pair of online demographically representative surveys of 2,000 Americans, including embedded experiments. They tested fact-checking and false-tag examples for false claims that would resonate with a set of pandemic perspectives.
One example was a false allegation by former President Donald Trump that the United States tested more COVID-19 than all countries combined. Simply tagging the claim with false did not affect the perception of the survey participants. Accuracy It’s more likely that you’ll actually share it on social media.In contrast, respondents who saw journalism fact checks were much less likely to believe in fake. Claim..
Kreps and Kriner say that sharing habits and behaviors provides a useful window for how people handle information and false information. According to previous research, sharing is an important indicator as it can broaden the scope of the news, and self-reported sharing willingness provides true insight into what people do socially. media..
Sarah E Kreps et al, COVID-19 Infodemic and the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing false alarms, Quarterly public opinion (2022). DOI: 10.1093 / poq / nfab075
Quote: Fact check, not fake tag, counters false information of COVID-19 (February 16, 2022), https: //phys.org/news/2022-02-fact-false-tags-counter Obtained from -covid-.html on February 16, 2022
This document is subject to copyright. No part may be reproduced without written permission, except for fair transactions for personal investigation or research purposes. Content is provided for informational purposes only.
Fact checking counters false information in COVID-19, not fake tags
Source link Fact checking counters false information in COVID-19, not fake tags