The judge said Friday that the federal government would decide whether it had the right to sue the law.
For the time being, the court proceedings leave the law saying that the clinic has helped reduce abortion by 80% in the second largest state in the United States.
Judge Sonia Sotomayor wrote that she would have now blocked the law.
“But future arbitrage promises provide calm comfort to Texas women seeking abortion treatment who are currently eligible for relief,” Sotomayor wrote.
The law has been in force since September, with the exception of a district court order suspension that lasted only 48 hours, and when heart activity is detected, some women become pregnant, usually for about six weeks. Abortion is prohibited before you know that you are.
This was long before the Supreme Court’s major abortion ruling allowed the state to ban abortion, but the court aborted from Mississippi in the Roe v. Wade case and the planned parent-child relationship vs. Casey case. I agreed to hear an appeal asking me to dismiss.
However, Texas law was written to avoid early federal court reviews by putting its enforcement in the hands of civilians rather than state officials.
See related articles: Abortion resumes at several Texas clinics after the judge suspends the law
The focus of the High Court’s debate is not on abortion bans, but on whether the Department of Justice can sue and obtain court orders that effectively impede law enforcement, the Supreme Court said in its brief order.
If the law remains in force, “This court’s decision is not safe. The state does not have to comply with or challenge disagreeing precedents. They simply illegally exercise their disliked rights. It can become a problem, “the government wrote. A brief description submitted earlier in the day.
For about 24 weeks, before the time when the foetation could survive outside the womb, the ban on abortion enforced by other states was blocked by the court because it contradicted the Supreme Court’s case.
See: The daughter of the groundbreaking abortion “Jane Law” tells her story
“Texas shouldn’t just combine its unconstitution with an unprecedented enforcement scheme designed to circumvent traditional mechanisms for judicial review and get different results,” the government wrote. rice field.
The day before, the state said the federal government lacked the power to file a proceeding to challenge Texas’ ban and asked the court to leave the law in place.
The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit after the Supreme Court refused previous efforts to temporarily suspend the measures taken by the abortion provider.
In early October, Judge Robert Pittman of the US District Court ruled, put the law on hold, and allowed the resumption of abortion.
Two days later, three judges from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the law.
The court has already heard discussions on December 1 in a Mississippi case seeking the court to dismiss Roe and Casey’s decision.
Copyright © 2021 By AP communication. all rights reserved.
Heartbeat Bill: Supreme Court Doesn’t Block Texas Abortion Law, Set Trial
Source link Heartbeat Bill: Supreme Court Doesn’t Block Texas Abortion Law, Set Trial