Recent research shows that in Vancouver’s historically working-class, low-income areas, migration, relationship elimination, and gentrification are all taking place.
A study by researchers at the University of Waterloo, considered one of the most livable cities in the world, shows Vancouver’s commitment to the concept of livability in the neighborhoods of North East False Creek (NEFC) and Downtown Eastside (DTES). I investigated various expressions of. By examining the history of the two neighborhoods, this study explores Vancouver’s habitability efforts. CityIncreasing inequality over the years.
“The history of Vancouver’s plans over the last 50 years has been dominated by very public efforts to make it more’livable’. On the surface, it’s hard to oppose the idea of a livable city. ” Giuseppe Torfo, a master’s student in the Faculty of Planning at the University of Waterloo and co-author of the study, said.
“Therefore, scholars, planners, and practitioners continue to question what livability really means, who will benefit from planning a livable city, and who will be excluded. is needed.”
In a detailed analysis of 37 planning documents and city council reports, Tolfo and professor Brian Doucet, who co-authored the study, said Vancouver City’s current definition, approach, and habitability-sensitive community gentrification. Established to contribute to. Beyond history.
“Our research is livable by visualizing the conflicts needed to create a’livable’space and highlighting the uneven social, spatial and racial consequences of livability planning. We are trying to reorient the concept of urban change, “said Doucet, Chairman of the Canadian Research Committee on Urban Change. ..
The pair emphasizes that Vancouver’s low-income residents and vulnerable people are facing a difficult future without proper action to stop the flow from Vancouver’s greater political and economic changes.
“Thinking about true habitability from a comprehensive or impartial perspective means considering a movement that demands universal rights to housing, racial justice, public transport and infrastructure, and education. Social infrastructure, Food securityFair representatives and democracy, and Health service“Torfo said.
Tolfo and Doucet can cause gentrification if habitability has very different meanings depending on the context, for example, if the land is transferred to a planning team whose interpretation of habitability is not fair. .. “This happened in Vancouver when the land around the highway viaduct was transferred from the DTES project to the NEFC project,” Doucet said.
They are to pave the way for planners and policy makers to “livability” and the capitalist signs of central movement and exclusion in analyzing what a livable city means. We encourage you to expand your efforts to work with those who are committed to publishing the erased history.
The study “Who’s Resident ?: A Plan for Gentrification of Residents and Memories in Vancouver” was recently published in a peer-reviewed journal. City.
Giuseppe Tolfo et al, Livability for who ?: Planning for habitability and memory gentrification in Vancouver, City (2022). DOI: 10.1016 / j.cities.2022.103564
University of Waterloo
Quote: Moving, erasing, and gentrifying vulnerable communities in “livable” Vancouver (April 25, 2022) https: //phys.org/news/2022-04-displacement-erasure-gentrification-vulnerable -Obtained April 25, 2022 from liveable.html
This document is subject to copyright. No part may be reproduced without written permission, except for fair transactions for personal investigation or research purposes. Content is provided for informational purposes only.
Moving, erasing, and gentrifying vulnerable communities in “livable” Vancouver
Source link Moving, erasing, and gentrifying vulnerable communities in “livable” Vancouver