Many studies have investigated the compulsory nature of prisons, but the role of prison experience (eg, confinement in restricted dwellings) and prison working hours of prisoners’ correctors Few things have been considered in the perception of fairness. A new study examined whether the prison experience of a sample of nationally representative prisoners had different effects over different periods of time that helped recognize the procedural fairness of imprisoned people. The study found that most of the prison experience of imprisoned individuals weakened their perception of procedural justice and justice.
This study by researchers at Iowa State University and Kent State University Quarterly justice, A publication of the Academy of Criminal Justice.
Daniel Butler, an assistant professor of sociology in criminal justice research at Iowa State University, said: Who led the research? “Such an investigation is essential because policy makers and researchers question how management strategies and policies in correctional facilities affect the well-being of imprisoned people.”
One way to measure the perception of orthodontic staff of orthodontic inmates is to find out if their behavior is procedurally correct by those imprisoned. Prison officers and other criminal justices who treat individuals with dignity and respect, make factual decisions, and give prisoners the opportunity to express themselves may be considered procedurally fair. The sex will be higher.
Using the National Prison Survey (NIS) 2011-2012, a nationally representative sample of imprisoned individuals who self-report their pre- and in-prison experiences, researchers work at the facility.
Researchers have been imprisoned in restricted residences (eg, cell confinement), institutionalized resistance (ie, filing complaints), assaults by staff and fellow prisoners, perceived congestion, and family visits. We measured the impact of experience in various prisons, including. — Regarding the perception of procedural fairness of imprisoned individual staff. They also considered the impact of the inmate’s staffing experience. prisoner Support, mental health.
Procedural impartiality was defined by considering eight measures, including staff impartiality, staff treatment for respect for prisoners, and staff attempts to meet prisoners’ needs. This study measures how prisoners’ perceptions change based on the length of time they are imprisoned and classifies prison time into less than one year, one to five years, and five years or more. bottom.
Studies have shown that most of the prison experiences of prisoners have reduced their awareness of the procedural fairness of staff, regardless of how long they have served. The results of this study are inconsistent with previous findings, probably because the experience measured in this study differs from that measured in other studies.
Specifically, the survey found that:
- The decline in staff awareness of procedural impartiality was the highest among prisoners imprisoned for less than a year.
- Confinement in restricted housing (up to 13 percent of study participants worked in restricted housing for 30 days or more) significantly reduced prisoners’ awareness of the procedural fairness of prisoners who worked in prison for less than five years. ..
- Prisoners who have been in prison for more than five years recognize that prisons are more dangerous than other prisoners, which reduces their awareness of procedural fairness. In addition, prisoners who worked for more than five years who reported having mental health problems tended to find their staff procedurally unfair.
- The race and ethnicity of the prisoners influenced the perception of the procedure Justice Throughout each category of Timeserve: Black and Hispanic prisoners felt that orthodontic staff were less procedural than white prisoners.
- With complaints and support from other prisoners, young prisoners also felt that the correction staff was procedurally unfair.
- Inmates who worked between one and five years and felt the facility was crowded had a more negative perception of the staff. Procedural fairness Than a prisoner who served less than a year in prison.
Within the limits of the study, the authors state that previous studies did not examine the characteristics of facilities or staff that identified them as important predictors of prison officer legitimacy and impartiality. In addition, NIS data contains information about experiences during the last 12 months of imprisonment or since admission to the current facility, excluding prison experience.
“The discretion and power given to orthodontic staff creates an imbalance,” said Star Solomon, an assistant professor of sociology at Kent State University, who co-authored the study. “When corrective agencies develop strategies to help prisoners adapt to prisons, it is possible to recognize that the compulsory nature of prisons makes it difficult for individuals to perceive treatment by prisons. It is important. staff Procedurally correct ”
H. Daniel Butler et al., Working Hours in Prison, Experience in Prison, Recognition of Procedural Fairness, Quarterly justice (2021). DOI: 10.1080 / 07418825.2021.1985159
Provided by the Crime and Justice Research Alliance
Quote: Prison experience, working hours obtained on October 22, 2021 from https: //phys.org/news/2021-10-prison-perceptions-officers-fairness.html (October 22, 2021) ) Regardless of the prison officer’s perception of fairness
This document is subject to copyright. No part may be reproduced without written permission, except for fair transactions for personal investigation or research purposes. The content is provided for informational purposes only.
Prison experience diminishes correctional officers’ perception of impartiality, regardless of time in prison
Source link Prison experience diminishes correctional officers’ perception of impartiality, regardless of time in prison