Right-wing voices have begun a powerful but misleading debate to justify the Trump administration’s failure to act during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020.
In a study published in the De Gruyter journal Publication of anthropological research, Professor Martha Lincoln of San Francisco State University, How Civil servant By adopting a tone that suggests, we have openly encouraged people to accept the widespread illness and death of the virus. Premature death In a more grand plan of things, the scale of death was normal and acceptable.
She tracked statements in support of the sacrifice of those who are likely to die of COVID-19 because she was presumed to be old or suffering from an “underlying disease.” The term was used to suggest that such people were less important because they did something wrong or were ill, Lincoln said.
Another catchy but misleading argument was that only one in 100 people infected with the virus would die. By spotlighting the hypothetical individual life potential, statistics provided false reassurance about the broader social and collective costs of transmission of unidentified illnesses. Also, people are seriously ill. I also ignored other effects, such as becoming ill and having long-lasting symptoms.
Right-wing commentators mistakenly compared COVID-19 deaths to non-communicable diseases such as road deaths in order to promote normal social and economic activity. This ignored the reality that cases of coronavirus could grow and spread.
Following President Trump, COVID-19 was argued not serious and there was no way to control its spread. “The right-wing message that a pandemic isn’t a big deal meant that people, especially those looking for a reason not to worry about the risk of infection, were falsely convinced,” Lincoln said. The fact that many of the supporting claims, such as comparing COVID-19 with bad cases of influenza, are in fact little or no basis, did not impede their circulation. “
This study emphasizes how the statements of elected officials should not be taken into account.”In response to mass shootings, lawmakers often provide’thoughts and prayers’, another way to claim that nothing can be done,” Lincoln said. It ’s very amazing to hear Pandemic The casualties were insignificant, unobtrusive, or unworthy of collective concern. “
This new rhetoric death The word, which spread in the United States in 2020, was not just tasteless and insensitive.
This treatise is part of the journal’s special issue, Pathological Politics: Life, Death, and Social Reactions to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Martha Lincoln, Necrosecurity, Immune Superiority, and Survivors in COVID-19’s Political Imagination, Publication of anthropological research (2021). DOI: 10.1515 / opan-2020-0104
Provided by Science POD
Quote: Right-wing rhetoric and pandemic victims tri tri tri miniaturization (31 May 2021) on 31 May 2021 https://phys.org/news/2021-05-right-wing- Obtained from rhetoric-trivialization-pandemic-casualties.html
This document is subject to copyright. No part may be reproduced without written permission, except for fair trade for personal investigation or research purposes. The content is provided for informational purposes only.
Right-wing rhetoric and pandemic victims tri triization miniaturization
Source link Right-wing rhetoric and pandemic victims tri triization miniaturization