The Supreme Court permits the January 6 Commission to obtain Trump documents

Washington (AP)

In response to former President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court has allowed the release of presidential documents requested by the Parliamentary Commission investigating the January 6 riots.

The judge on Wednesday refused Trump’s bid to withhold documents from the Commission until the issue was finally resolved by the court. Trump’s lawyer wanted to prolong the court battle and put the document on hold.

After the High Court proceedings, there are no legal obstacles to submitting documents held by the National Archives and Records Administration. They include the President’s Diary, visitor records, draft speeches, and handwritten notes dealing with January 6 from the file of former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

The Commission has already begun to receive records that Trump wanted to keep secret, saying Republican Rep. Bennie Thompson and Republican Rep. Liz Cheney are chairman and vice-chairman, respectively.

“Tonight’s Supreme Court action is the rule of law and the victory of American democracy,” Thompson and Chainy pledged to “reveal all the facts about the January 6 violence and its causes.” Said in a statement.

White House spokesman Mike Gwin called the ruling a “significant step forward” in the investigation, “in ensuring accountability for unprecedented attacks on democracy and the rule of law.”

The House Committee agreed to postpone attempts to obtain some documents at the request of the Biden White House. The current administration was concerned that publishing all of the Trump administration’s documents requested by the Commission could undermine national security and executive privilege.

One of the judges, Clarence Thomas said he would have accepted Trump’s request to keep the document on hold.

Trump’s lawyer urged the High Court to overturn the Washington Federal Court of Appeals and prevent the release of records, even after President Joe Biden relinquished executive privilege.

In an unsigned opinion, there is “serious and substantive concern” about whether the court can win a court order to prevent the disclosure of certain records while the former president is in office in this situation. I admitted.

However, the court noted that the Court of Appeals ruled that Trump’s claim of privilege over the document would fail under any circumstances “even if he was incumbent.”

The issue of the former president’s ability to claim executive privilege has to wait another day, he said.

The court disputed the Court of Appeals’ conclusions, disregarding the interests of the former president, suggesting that the current president can essentially ignore his predecessor’s allegations.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who worked at the White House under President George W. Bush, argues: Does not support privilege claims. “

However, Kavanaugh, Trump’s appointed man, did not object to Wednesday’s results, nor did Trump’s other two judges, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett.

Before and after the riots, Trump promoted a false theory of fraud, suggesting that the “real rebellion” was on the election day when he lost to Biden.

Trump’s lawyers repeated the discussions they had in the lower courts, urging judges to intervene, claiming that the case involved all future residents of the White House. Mr. Trump’s lawyer said the former president had “a clear right to protect confidential records from premature dissemination.”

“Parliament cannot engage in a meandering fishing expedition in the hope of embarrassing President Trump or exposing the sensitive and privileged communication of the president and his staff” for exposure “,” they said. Added.

However, the House Committee said in a brief summary of the High Court that the facts of the case were “unprecedented” but the decision was “not difficult.”

There was no explanation about the timing of the court proceedings. However, the National Archives said it would submit to the Court of Appeals and Trump’s lawyers some documents alleging that they were not part of Wednesday’s proceedings unless there was a new court order.

Also on Wednesday, the House Committee investigating the House of Parliament riots issued a subpoena to the leaders of the alt-right group who appeared in an event promoting unfounded allegations of post-election fraud.

The Commission has told Nick Fentes and Patrick Casey, an internet personality who promoted the beliefs of white supremacists, about the January 6, 2021 elections and the promotion of unsupported claims on the grounds of the Capitol. Requested records and testimonies.

Since its inception last summer, the Commission has interviewed about 350 people with the aim of creating a comprehensive record of the attacks and their events.


The Associated Press writer Farnoush Amiri contributed to this report.

Copyright 2022 Fort Myers Broadcasting Company. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without prior written consent.

The Supreme Court permits the January 6 Commission to obtain Trump documents

Source link The Supreme Court permits the January 6 Commission to obtain Trump documents

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button