Minneapolis (NewsNation Now) — From the day after the judge heard testimony from several investigators who handled evidence of the case at the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who was charged with the murder of George Floyd. Many witnesses will run for office, and national armed experts and lawyers have questioned Floyd’s drug use.
On May 25, 2020, Chauvin pushed his knee into the neck of Floyd, a 46-year-old black man, for about nine minutes. Chauvin pleaded not guilty to murder and slaughter in Floyd’s arrest. This happened on suspicion that Floyd used a fake $ 20 invoice to buy cigarettes at a convenience store.
County inspectors determined Floyd’s death to be a police murder. Chauvin’s lawyer claims that Floyd’s death was due to an overdose of drugs, but prosecutors say medical evidence contradicts it.
Here are some of the important moments from the 8th day of Wednesday’s testimony:
“The force was not rational in that position.”
National armed use expert Sgt. Los Angeles Police Department Jody Steiger reviewed 2,500 cases of police use of force and resumed testimony on Tuesday.
Steiger told the jury that the handcuffed Floyd did not pose an imminent threat and did not actively resist when Chauvin used his deadly force.
“In my opinion, no force was rational in that position,” Steiger testified. He said the pressure caused by Chauvin’s weight could lead to suffocation and death.
Asked by defendant lawyer Eric Nelson, Steiger agreed that various factors need to be considered in a fluid situation when considering the amount of force police officers use. ..
“It must be proportional,” Stiger said. “You are constantly reassessing during the time frame.”
Nelson showed photos of Steiger taken at various times in the incident and asked if Chauvin’s knees were on the shoulder blades instead of Floyd’s neck.
“It seems to be above the scapula rather than the scapula,” Stiger testified.
“I ate too much medicine.” Or “I’m not taking medicine.”
The prosecutor called James Rayerson, a special agent at the Minnesota Criminal Arrest Bureau, who is an expert in the use of force and the chief investigator in the case.
Six months after the incident, Chauvin’s lawyer testified that police officers had found a police car that was later determined to be a pill with Floyd’s DNA in a police car that tried to put it in. .. Chauvin’s defense states that the pill contains methamphetamine and fentanyl.
Part of Nelson’s strategy to protect Chauvin was to say that Floyd’s death was due to illegal drug use.
Nelson played a short clip of the arrest case that came from another policeman’s body camera video, and the chaotic turmoil when Floyd was handcuffed, lying on his stomach, yelling, and moaning in pain. I showed a lot of scenes.
“Does it sound like he says,’Did I eat too much medicine?'” Nelson asked.
Riason agreed with Nelson that he heard in one video of the incident, as if Floyd had said he had “eaten too much drug.”
But during further questions from prosecutor Matthew Frank, Ryanson testified differently.
He made Reyerson say he hadn’t listened carefully to the passage before. After a break for regrouping, Frank played a longer clip from the same body cam video,
“I’ve heard that in context, can you see what Mr. Floyd is saying there?” Frank asked.
“I think Mr. Floyd said,’I don’t take medicine,'” Ryerson replied.
“So it’s a little different from what you were asked when you watched only part of the video, right?” Frank asked.
“Yes, sir,” said the agent.
The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report. Report by Reuters Jonathan Allen and Brendan O’Brien. Report by AP Amy Forliti, Steve Karnowski and Tammy Webber.
Suggest a fix
Things to know about going to the 9th day of the Chauvin trial
Source link Things to know about going to the 9th day of the Chauvin trial